Jaworowski Changelog

Point #9 modified
This point was about how Jaworowski was wrong about a “clear inverse correlation” between depth and CO₂ concentration. As Gavin correctly pointed out in the comments, the Greenland data was a poor choice for purposes of illustration, because the presence of dust and other contaminants makes the Greenland CO₂ record unreliable. This was also noted in the paper by Indermuhle et al., so I can only plead carelessness.
Antarctic data has been substituted and the discussion revised. Here’s the original:
_______________________________________________________________________
(9) ” … a clear inverse correlation …”
See last comment. Anyone who is interested can go to the Greenland Summit site, get the data and plot it. Let’s plot CO₂ vs. depth for one of the GRIP cores and look for a “clear inverse correlation”:
Worth a thousand words, ain’t it?
_______________________________________________________________________